KANE vs DE BLASIO

9-21-21

Download the 65 page complaint of KANE vs DE BLASIO filed in federal court today by TEACHERS FOR CHOICE attorney Sujata Gibson challenging the NYC DOE vaccine mandate as immoral and illegal.

15 thoughts on “KANE vs DE BLASIO

  1. Scientific research in Israel and other countries have found that Natural Immunity for people who have recovered from COVID-19 is more effective than Artificial Immunity via inoculation. The NYC’s decision to mandate vaccine is unconstitutional and needs to be stopped. It is ironic that illegal migrants coming through the Southern Border are not required to get vaccinated whereas the Americans citizens are being forced to be inoculated. Shame on the De Blasio administration and other government officials at the federal, state and city levels who have politicized COVID-19 and used it as a weapon to violate our God’s given rights! A class action lawsuit on behalf of We The People is warranted!

    Like

  2. When the side supporting the vaccine mandate cites the Supreme Court ruling Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905), do they know it was cited as a precedent for Buck v. Bell (1927), justifying eugenics for several decades. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., explained that “the principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” It led to the sterilization of an estimated 60,000 women before it was overturned.

    Like

    1. Excellent point! Jacobson has certainly been used for very evil purposes in the past. Funny most people don’t know that Jacobson also established the requirement of medical exemptions to vaccination – people love to be selective with this case and hid many important details.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: